Task 9

Con motivo de la presentación del segundo parcial de lenguas extranjeras, les proponemos un pequeño video sobre uno de nuestros temas favoritos del blog LA ALEGORÍA DE LA CAVERNA DE PLATÓN.

ghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffNbC0O5XCg

Task 8

Compartimos la rubrica elaborada en grupos. 

Criterio	Insatisfactorio	Limitado	Bueno	Excelente
Estética (diseño)	0,25	0,5	1	2
Tareas realizadas(0-3-6-9)	0,25	0,5	1	2
Utilización de textos académicos	0,25	0,5	1	2
Criterio didáctico	0,25	0,5	1	2
Uso de organizadores gráficos y enlaces	0,25	0,5	1	2
Creatividad	0,25	0,5	1	2

Task 7

Philosophy and theology

Main article: Philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard

Kierkegaard has been called a philosopher, a theologian,the Father of Existentialism, both atheistic and theistic variations, a literary critic,^]a social theorist, a humorist, a psychologist, and a poet. Two of his influential ideas are "subjectivity"^]and the notion popularly referred to as "leap of faith".However, the Danish equivalent to the English phrase "leap of faith" does not appear in the original Danish nor is the English phrase found in current English translations of Kierkegaard's works. Kierkegaard does mention the concepts of "faith" and "leap" together many times in his works.

The leap of faith is his conception of how an individual would believe in God or how a person would act in love. Faith is not a decision based on evidence that, say, certain beliefs about God are true or a certain person is worthy of love. No such evidence could ever be enough to completely justify the kind of total commitment involved in true religious faith or romantic love. Faith involves making that commitment anyway. Kierkegaard thought that to have faith is at the same time to have doubt. So, for example, for one to truly have faith in God, one would also have to doubt one's beliefs about God; the doubt is the rational part of a person's thought involved in weighing evidence, without which the faith would have no real substance. Someone who does not realize that Christian doctrine is inherently doubtful and that there can be no objective certainty about its truth does not have faith but is merely credulous. For example, it takes no faith to believe that a pencil or a table exists, when one is looking at it and touching it. In the same way, to believe or have faith in God is to know that one has no perceptual or any other access to God, and yet still has faith in God. Kierkegaard writes, "doubt is conquered by faith, just as it is faith which has brought doubt into the world".

Kierkegaard also stresses the importance of the self, and the self's relation to the world, as being grounded in self-reflection and introspection. He argued in Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments that "subjectivity is truth" and "truth is subjectivity." This has to do with a distinction between what is objectively true and an individual's subjective relation (such as indifference or commitment) to that truth. People who in some sense believe the same things may relate to those beliefs quite differently. Two individuals may both believe that many of those around them are poor and deserve help, but this knowledge may lead only one of them to decide to actually help the poor. This is how Kierkegaard put it: "What a priceless invention statistics are, what a glorious fruit of culture, what a characteristic counterpart to thede te narratur fabula [the tale is told to you] of antiquity. Schleiermacher so enthusiastically declares that knowledge does not perturb religiousness, and that the religious person does not sit safeguarded by a lightning rod and scoff at God; yet with the help of statistical tables one laughs at all of life." ^]In other words Kierkegaard says: "Who has the more difficult task: the teacher who lectures on earnest things a meteor's distance from everyday life -- or the learner who should put it to use?"

Kierkegaard primarily discusses subjectivity with regard to religious matters. As already noted, he argues that doubt is an element of faith and that it is impossible to gain any objective certainty about religious doctrines such as the existence of God or the life of Christ. The most one could hope for would be the conclusion that it is probable that the Christian doctrines are true, but if a person were to believe such doctrines only to the degree they seemed likely to be true, he or she would not be genuinely religious at all. Faith consists in a subjective relation of absolute commitment to these doctrines.^[196]

Philosophical criticism                  

Kierkegaard's famous philosophical 20th century critics include Theodor Adorno and Emmanuel Levinas. Non-religious philosophers such as Jean-Paul Sartre and Martin Heideggersupported many aspects of Kierkegaard's philosophical views, but rejected some of his religious views.^[197][198] One critic wrote that Adorno's book Kierkegaard: Construction of the Aesthetic is "the most irresponsible book ever written on Kierkegaard"^[199] because Adorno takes Kierkegaard's pseudonyms literally, and constructs a philosophy which makes him seem incoherent and unintelligible. Another reviewer says that "Adorno is [far away] from the more credible translations and interpretations of the Collected Works of Kierkegaard we have today."^[85]

Levinas' main attack on Kierkegaard focused on his ethical and religious stages, especially in Fear and Trembling. Levinas criticises the leap of faith by saying this suspension of the ethical and leap into the religious is a type of violence. He states: "Kierkegaardian violence begins when existence is forced to abandon the ethical stage in order to embark on the religious stage, the domain of belief. But belief no longer sought external justification. Even internally, it combined communication and isolation, and hence violence and passion. That is the origin of the relegation of ethical phenomena to secondary status and the contempt of the ethical foundation of being which has led, through Nietzsche, to the amoralism of recent philosophies."^[]

Levinas pointed to the Judeo-Christian belief that it was God who first commanded Abraham to sacrifice Isaac and that an angel commanded Abraham to stop. If Abraham were truly in the religious realm, he would not have listened to the angel's command and should have continued to kill Isaac. To Levinas, "transcending ethics" seems like a loophole to excuse would-be murderers from their crime and thus is unacceptable.^[] One interesting consequence of Levinas' critique is that it seemed to reveal that Levinas viewed God as a projection of inner ethical desire rather than an absolute moral agent.^[] However, one of Kierkegaard's central points in Fear and Trembling was that the religious sphere entailsthe ethical sphere; Abraham had faith that God is always in one way or another ethically in the right, even when He commands someone to kill. Therefore, deep down, Abraham had faith that God, as an absolute moral authority, would never allow him in the end to do something as ethically heinous as murdering his own child, and so he passed the test of blind obedience versus moral choice.

Sartre objected to the existence of God: If existence precedes essence, it follows from the meaning of the term sentient that a sentient being cannot be complete or perfect. In Being and Nothingness, Sartre's phrasing is that God would be a pour-soi (a being-for-itself; a consciousness) who is also an en-soi (a being-in-itself; a thing) which is a contradiction in terms. Critics of Sartre rebutted this objection by stating that it rests on a false dichotomy and a misunderstanding of the traditional Christian view of God.^[]

Sartre agreed with Kierkegaard's analysis of Abraham undergoing anxiety (Sartre calls it anguish), but claimed that God told Abraham to do it. In his lecture, Existentialism is a Humanism, Sartre wondered whether Abraham ought to have doubted whether God actually spoke to him.^[] In Kierkegaard's view, Abraham's certainty had its origin in that 'inner voice' which cannot be demonstrated or shown to another ("The problem comes as soon as Abraham wants to be understood"). To Kierkegaard, every external "proof" or justification is merely on the outside and external to the subject.^] Kierkegaard's proof for the immortality of the soul, for example, is rooted in the extent to which one wishes to live forever.

Faith was something that Kierkegaard often wrestled with throughout his writing career; under both his real name and behind pseudonyms, he explored many different aspects of faith. These various aspects include faith as a spiritual goal, the historical orientation of faith (particularly toward Jesus Christ), faith being a gift from God, faith as dependency on a historical object, faith as a passion, and faith as a resolution to personal despair. Even so, it has been argued that Kierkegaard never offers a full, explicit and systematic account of what faith is. Either/Or was published 20 February 1843; it was mostly written during Kierkegaard's stay in Berlin, where he took notes on Schelling's Philosophy of Revelation. According to the Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Religion, Either/Or (vol. 1) consists of essays of literary and music criticism, a set of romantic-like-aphorisms, a whimsical essay on how to avoid boredom, a panegyric on the unhappiest possible human being, a diary recounting a supposed seduction, and (vol. II) two enormous didactic and hortatory ethical letters and a sermon. This opinion is a reminder of the type of controversy Kierkegaard tried to encourage in many of his writings both for readers in his own generation and for subsequent generations as well.

Resumen en del texto en español :

Artículo principal: Filosofía de Søren Kierkegaard

Kierkegaard ha sido llamado un filósofo, teólogo, el Padre del existencialismo, tanto ateo y variaciones teístas, un crítico literario, un teórico social,  un humorista,  un psicólogo,  y un poeta.  Dos de sus ideas influyentes son "subjetividad", y la noción popularmente se conoce como "salto de fe".  Sin embargo, el equivalente danés a la frase Inglés "salto de la fe "no aparece en el original danés ni es la frase inglés encontrado en traducciones inglesas actuales de obras de Kierkegaard. Kierkegaard menciona los conceptos de "fe" y "salto" juntos muchas veces en sus obras. La fe consiste en hacer que el compromiso de todos modos. Kierkegaard pensaba que para tener fe es al mismo tiempo tener dudas. Así, por ejemplo, que uno tenga verdaderamente la fe en Dios, uno también tiene que dudar de las creencias acerca de Dios; la duda es la parte racional del pensamiento de una persona involucrada en valoración de la prueba, sin la cual la fe no tendría ningún fundamento real. Alguien que no se da cuenta de que la doctrina cristiana es inherentemente dudosa y que no puede haber ninguna certeza objetiva acerca de su verdad no tiene fe, pero no es más crédula. Por ejemplo, se necesita fe para creer que existe un lápiz o una mesa, cuando uno está buscando en ella y tocarla. De la misma manera, creer o tener fe en Dios es saber que uno no tiene ninguna percepción o cualquier otro acceso a Dios, y sin embargo, todavía tiene fe en Dios. Kierkegaard escribe, "la duda es conquistada por fe, así como es la fe la que ha llevado a la duda en el mundo”

Críticas a su Filosofía

Famosos críticos  filosóficos del siglo 20 tomaron a  Kierkegaard, incluyen Theodor Adorno y Emmanuel Levinas. Filósofos no religiosos, como Jean-Paul Sartre y Martin Heidegger apoyaron muchos aspectos de las ideas filosóficas de Kierkegaard, pero rechazaron algunos de sus puntos de vista religiosos. Por ejemplo :

Sartre se opuso a la existencia de Dios: Si la existencia precede a la esencia, se deduce del significado de la expresión consciente de que un ser sensible no puede ser completa o perfecta. En El ser y la nada, el fraseo de Sartre es que Dios sería un pour-soi (un ser-para-sí; una conciencia) que es también un en-soi (un ser-en-sí, una cosa) que es una contradicción en términos. [197] [203] los críticos de Sartre refutó esta objeción diciendo que se apoya en una falsa dicotomía y una mala comprensión de la visión cristiana tradicional de Dios.

Sartre estuvo de acuerdo con el análisis de Kierkegaard de Abraham sufrir ansiedad (Sartre llama angustia), pero afirmó que Dios le dijo a Abraham para hacerlo. En su conferencia, El existencialismo es un humanismo, Sartre se pregunta si Abraham debería haber dudado de que Dios realmente le habló.  En vista de Kierkegaard, la certeza de Abraham tuvo su origen en esa "voz interior" que no puede ser demostrada o muestra a otra ("el problema viene tan pronto como Abraham quiere ser entendido"). [205] para Kierkegaard, cada externa "prueba" o la justificación no es más que en el exterior y exterior al sujeto. [206] prueba de Kierkegaard de la inmortalidad del alma, por ejemplo, tiene sus raíces en la medida en que uno desea vivir para siempre.

La fe era algo que Kierkegaard menudo luchó con toda su carrera de escritor; tanto bajo su nombre real y detrás de seudónimos, exploró muchos aspectos diferentes de la fe. Estos diversos aspectos incluyen la fe como una meta espiritual, la orientación histórica de la fe (en especial hacia Jesucristo), la fe es un don de Dios, la fe como la dependencia de un objeto histórico, la fe como una pasión, y la fe como una resolución a la desesperación personal . Aun así, se ha argumentado que Kierkegaard nunca ofrece una relación completa, explícita y sistemática de lo que la fe es.

Task 4

Biography

Early life

Jean-Paul Sartre was born in Paris as the only child of Jean-Baptiste Sartre, an officer of the French Navy, and Anne-Marie Schweitzer. His mother was of Alsatian origin and the first cousin of Nobel Prize laureate Albert Schweitzer. (Her father, Charles Schweitzer, was the older brother of Albert Schweitzer's father, Louis Théophile.)When Sartre was two years old, his father died of a fever. Anne-Marie moved back to her parents' house in Meudon, where she raised Sartre with help from her father, a teacher of German who taught Sartre mathematics and introduced him to classical literature at a very early age. When he was twelve, Sartre's mother remarried, and the family moved to La Rochelle, where he was frequently bullied.

As a teenager in the 1920s, Sartre became attracted to philosophy upon reading Henri Bergson's essay Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness.He studied and earned a degree in philosophy in Paris at the École Normale Supérieure, an institution of higher education that was the alma mater for several prominent French thinkers and intellectuals. It was at ENS that Sartre began his lifelong, sometimes fractious, friendship with Raymond Aron. Sartre was influenced by many aspects of Western philosophy, adopting ideas from Immanuel Kant, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Søren Kierkegaard, Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger, among others. Perhaps the most decisive influence on Sartre's philosophical development was his weekly attendance at Alexandre Kojève's seminars, which continued for a number of years.

From his first years in the École Normale, Sartre was one of its fiercest pranksters.In 1927, his antimilitarist satirical cartoon in the revue of the school, coauthored with Georges Canguilhem, particularly upset the director Gustave Lanson. In the same year, with his comrades Nizan, Larroutis, Baillou and Herland, he organized a media prank following Charles Lindbergh's successful New York-Paris flight; Sartre & Co. called newspapers and informed them that Lindbergh was going to be awarded an honorary École degree. Many newspapers, including Le Petit Parisien, announced the event on 25 May. Thousands, including journalists and curious spectators, showed up, unaware that what they were witnessing was a stunt involving a Lindbergh look-alike. The public's resultant outcry[need quotation to verify] forced Lanson to resign.

In 1929 at the École Normale, he met Simone de Beauvoir, who studied at the Sorbonne and later went on to become a noted philosopher, writer, and feminist. The two became inseparable and lifelong companions, initiating a romantic relationship, though they were not monogamous. The first time Sartre took the exam to become a college instructor, he failed. But he took it a second time and was first in his class, with Beauvoir second.

Sartre was drafted into the French Army from 1929 to 1931 and served as a meteorologist for some time. He later argued in 1959 that each French person was responsible for the collective crimes during the Algerian War of Independence.

Together, Sartre and de Beauvoir challenged the cultural and social assumptions and expectations of their upbringings, which they considered bourgeois, in both lifestyle and thought. The conflict between oppressive, spiritually destructive conformity (mauvaise foi, literally, "bad faith") and an "authentic" way of "being" became the dominant theme of Sartre's early work, a theme embodied in his principal philosophical work L'Être et le Néant (Being and Nothingness) (1943). Sartre's introduction to his philosophy is his work Existentialism and Humanism (1946), originally presented as a lecture.

Late life and death[edit]

Hélène de Beauvoir's house in Goxwiller, where Sartre tried to hide from the media after being awarded the Nobel Prize.

In 1964 Sartre renounced literature in a witty and sardonic account of the first ten years of his life, Les mots (Words). The book is an ironic counterblast to Marcel Proust, whose reputation had unexpectedly eclipsed that of André Gide (who had provided the model of littérature engagée for Sartre's generation). Literature, Sartre concluded, functioned ultimately as a bourgeois substitute for real commitment in the world. In October 1964, Sartre was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature but he declined it. He was the first Nobel laureate to voluntarily decline the prize, and remains one of only two laureates to do so. In 1945, he had refused the Légion d'honneur.The Nobel prize was announced on 22 October 1964; on 14 October, Sartre had written a letter to the Nobel Institute, asking to be removed from the list of nominees, and warning that he would not accept the prize if awarded, but the letter went unread; on 23 October, Le Figaro published a statement by Sartre explaining his refusal. He said he did not wish to be "transformed" by such an award, and did not want to take sides in an East vs. West cultural struggle by accepting an award from a prominent Western cultural institution. After being awarded the prize he tried to escape the media by hiding in the house of Simone's sister Hélène de Beauvoir in Goxwiller, Alsace.

Jean-Paul Sartre in Venice in 1967

Though his name was then a household word (as was "existentialism" during the tumultuous 1960s), Sartre remained a simple man with few possessions, actively committed to causes until the end of his life, such as the May 1968 strikes in Paris during the summer of 1968 during which he was arrested for civil disobedience. President Charles de Gaulle intervened and pardoned him, commenting that "you don't arrest Voltaire." Sartre's and de Beauvoir's grave in the Cimetière de Montparnasse. In 1975, when asked how he would like to be remembered, Sartre replied:

  I would like [people] to remember Nausea, [my plays] No Exit and The Devil and the Good Lord, and then my two philosophical works, more particularly the second one, Critique of Dialectical Reason. Then my essay on Genet, Saint Genet.... If these are remembered, that would be quite an achievement, and I don't ask for more. As a man, if a certain Jean-Paul Sartre is remembered, I would like people to remember the milieu or historical situation in which I lived,... how I lived in it, in terms of all the aspirations which I tried to gather up within myself.

Sartre's physical condition deteriorated, partially because of the merciless pace of work (and the use of amphetamines)  he put himself through during the writing of the Critique and a massive analytical biography of Gustave Flaubert (The Family Idiot), both of which remained unfinished. He suffered from hypertension, and became almost completely blind in 1973. Sartre was a notorious chain smoker, which could also have contributed to the deterioration of his health.

Sartre died on 15 April 1980 in Paris from edema of the lung. He had not wanted to be buried at Père-Lachaise Cemetery between his mother and stepfather, so it was arranged that he be buried at Montparnasse Cemetery. At his funeral on Saturday, April 19, fifty thousand Parisians descended onto Boulevard Montparnasse to accompany Sartre's cortege. The funeral started at "the hospital at two p.m., then filed through the fourteenth arrondissement, past all Sartre's haunts, and entered the cemetery through the gate on the Boulevard Edgar Quinet." Sartre was initially buried in a temporary grave to the left of the cemetery gate. Four days later the body was disinterred for cremation at Père-Lachaise Cemetery, and his ashes were reburied at the permanent site in Montparnasse Cemetery, to the right of the cemetery gate.

Referencias: Names, Dates

RESUMEN: 

Filósofo y escritor francés. Precoz lector de los clásicos franceses, en 1915 ingresó en el liceo Henri IV de París y conoció a Paul Nizan, con quien inició una estrecha amistad. Al año siguiente, el segundo matrimonio de su madre lo obligó a trasladarse a La Rochelle; hasta 1920 no regresó a París. En 1924 inició sus estudios universitarios en la École Normale Supérieure, donde conoció a Simone de Beauvoir, con quien estableció una relación que duraría toda su vida.

Task 6

-WEBQUEST-

Aquí les dejamos el link de nuestro webquest, esperemos que les guste:

http://www.aula21.net/Wqfacil/webquest.php

Por las dudas que hubiera algún problema para acceder al link les dejamos la versión PDF:

filosofia

http://www.aula21.net/Wqfacil/webquest.php#arriba 1/2

Introducción | Tarea | Proceso | Recursos | Evaluación | Conclusión | Créditos
filosofia

Autor: presocratico

E-mail: gonzalosobrera@gmail.com

Área: 1 Nivel: 2

INTRODUCCIÓN El objetivo es volvernos capaces de reconocer un argumento y
analizarlo, es decir reconocer las partes que lo componen.

TAREA Para ello deberán realizar una presentación en power point donde
se incluya el texto argumentativo, la decontrucción argumental y el
análisis de las premisas respecto a la veracidad de las mismas.

PROCESO En grupos de no más de 3 busquen en las páginas webs de los
diarios locales, las secciones editoriales (allí es más fácil
reconocer textos argumentativos)
Discutan en el grupo luego de haber seleccionado el texto y
planteen la conclusión que el autor del mismo intenta exponer
Rastreen las razones expuestas para sostener dicha conclusión
Realicen la descontrucción del argumento
Planteen posibles críticas a la o las premisas como forma de
derrotar la conclusión.

RECURSOS Aquí se adjuntan algunos links de los diarios más conocidos que
pueden consultar.
Diario el país - http://www.elpais.com.uy/
Diario el Observador - http://www.elobservador.com.uy/portada/
Diario la República - http://www.republica.com.uy/?
La Diaria - http://ladiaria.com.uy/

EVALUACIÓN Los criterios de evaluación serán los que trabajamos en clase a
partir del texto de Gonzalez Porta.

CONCLUSIÓN El correcto análisis de un texto argumentativo nos ayuda a
promover el correcto intercambio de ideas y opiniones propios de
una sociedad democrática.

Imprimir - Arriba
8/10/2014 filosofia
http://www.aula21.net/Wqfacil/webquest.php#arriba 2/2
(Página creada con 1,2,3 Tu WebQuest - http://www.aula21.net/)